Please complete this anonymous survey to share feedback on each festival level in which your school participates. Festival Level(Required) District Sectional State District(Required) 01 Drummond 02 Tomahawk 03 Prescott 04 Regis 05 n/a 2022 06 Ashwaubenon 07 Holmen 08 DeForest 09 Oshkosh West 10 Reedsburg 11 Middleton 12SE Kenosha Tremper 12NW Sussex Hamilton 13 Virtual Sectional(Required) 1 UW-Eau Claire/Pablo Ctr 2 Oconto Falls HS 3 Waunakee HS 4 Manitowoc Lincoln 5 Waukesha West 6 Virtual State Participation(Required) In-person One-Act In-person Non-One-Act Virtual One-Act Virtual Non-One-Act WISDAA Member(Required)Is your school a current member school of the WISDAA? Yes No Festival Venue/HostPlease rate the areas below, where 5 stars = highly satisfied and 1 star = very dissatisfied.Registration Process(Required)Ease of registration process on SpeechWire.ExcellentPretty goodNeutralNot so greatTerribleAnywhereSeat(Required)Ease of using AnywhereSeat to upload/present video of virtual show.ExcellentPretty goodNeutralNot so greatTerribleOn-site Registration(Required)Retrieving registration materials/check-in process.ExcellentPretty goodNeutralNot so greatTerribleState Performance Venue(Required)In which venue did you perform? Barnett Theatre Light Recital Hall Communication(Required)How well did the host communicate schedules, procedures, and logistics?ExcellentPretty goodNeutralNot so greatTerribleLoad-in/Load-out(Required)Process and ease of load-in/load-out, including distance, staging/waiting area, etc.ExcellentPretty goodNeutralNot so greatTerribleHomeroom facility(Required)ExcellentPretty goodNeutralNot so greatTerribleLogistics Staff(Required)How professional and welcoming were on-site personnel/volunteersExcellentPretty goodNeutralNot so greatTerribleLighting setup(Required)Quality/suitability of lighting instruments, distribution of lighting areas on stage, warm/cool options, control board, etc.ExcellentPretty goodNeutralNot so greatTerribleSound setup(Required)Quality of output, ease and control of input, etc.ExcellentPretty goodNeutralNot so greatTerribleStage facilities(Required)Quality/suitability of performance venueExcellentPretty goodNeutralNot so greatTerribleFacility/Host CommentsPlease offer any comments to contextualize/elaborate upon ratings you provided above.EvaluationWISDAA continues to strive to balance directors’ desires for more detailed feedback, and adjudicators’ feeling overwhelmed by the number of evaluation criteria, and degree of detail and feedback they must provide in the finite time for each performance, while trying to observe as much of each show as possible, without diverting too much attention to the process of comments. We welcome suggestions on further fine-tuning our evaluation process to find middle ground among these perspectives.Evaluation Instrument(Required)Please provide feedback on the evaluation sheet.Strongly disagreeDisagreeAgreeStrongly agreeThe number and nature of rubric areas give a balanced way of assessing productions. The standards-based numerical ratings give me clear indication of our mastery of various criteria. The overall evaluation match awards you received or did not receive. Evaluation Sheet CommentsPlease offer any comments to contextualize/elaborate upon ratings you provided above.AdjudicationAdjudication(Required)Please reflect on ratings, comments, and evaluation in general.Strongly disagreeDisagreeAgreeStrongly agreeAdjudicators’ comments justified ratings. Adjudicators wrote substantive, constructive feedback. Adjudicators did not allow personal preference and bias to cloud their feedback. Adjudicator Concerns If you have concerns pertaining to specific adjudicators, and wish for them to not adjudicate your show again, please complete the Adjudicator Concern Form. It is important to document such concerns, both to provide an opportunity to remediate adjudicators who need to improve, as well as to strengthen the guidance we give adjudicators. All concerns shared are confidential.Oral Response(Required)Did you have an oral response to your performance? Yes No RespondentName of respondent (if known/remembered) Oral Response Effectiveness(Required)Please reflect on ratings, comments, and evaluation in general.Strongly disagreeDisagreeAgreeStrongly agreeThe oral response captured the essence of written comments. The oral respondent addressed positive aspects as well as those needing improvement. The responndent engaged students in a meaningul and engaging manner. The oral respondent made my students’ efforts feel validated. Respondent CommentsGeneral feedback about the oral respondent to contextualize/elaborate upon ratings you provided above. If you wish to lodge specific concerns/complaints, please complete the Adjudicator Concern Form.Other Festival ExperiencesWatch One-Acts(Required)Did your students watch other schools’ one-act performances? Yes No State Programming(Required)What programming did you and/or your students participate in? Thursday Showcase Friday Musical Showcase Student Workshops Educator Workshops Thespy Excellence Awards Contest Tech Challenge Contest Exhibit Expo Auditions WorkshopsAny feedback you wish to leave about workshops.ThespysAny feedback you wish to leave about Thespian Excellence Awards (formerly, “Individual Events”).Tech ChallengeAny feedback you wish to leave about the Tech Challenge contest.State Festival: General CommentsOverarching comments about the Wisconsin Interscholastic Theatre Festival.CommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
