Account
Serial03
Date Updated04/21/2022
CategoryMoments in History
Contestant Name(s)Matthew Klitzke 245F2
Nature of Concern
  • Other
Describe concern

The section of the critique sheet we are questioning is the Physical Delivery. The comments do not match the score awarded. All positive comments are given with a one point deduction. According to the Speech Adjudicator Profile on page 14 of the Handbook, it states, “If low ratings are given, they must be combined with constructive suggestions for improvement.” We do not find any suggestions to warrant a score of 4 in this category. Therefore, we are asking for clarification on the Physical Delivery score.

What adjudicator specifically wrote or did

“The transitions walking from one side to another were an effective means of transitions, and were very smooth. It added a nice touch to your overall speech. Your poster also was a nice touch to your speech. Your hand movements were subtle and also added to the overall emotion of it. All in all, well done!” Score: 4

Evaluation Sheet(s)Evaluation Sheet(s)
Round/TimeVirtual

Committee Review

Resolution:Upheld
Disposition

The referee committee reviewed the complaint and contacted the adjudicator who remembered the student speaker. The adjudicator did confirm that she made a mistake and awarded a score of “4” instead of 5 in the last element. The adjudicator apologized for the error. The total score should be 25.

Result Number0
Other Entries