Pilot Speech Evaluation Form Survey – Wis. Interscholastic Speech & Dramatic Arts Assoc.

Thank you for taking a few moments to share feedback about the WISDAA's pilot evaluation sheet of four (4) criteria areas and six (6) rating points. Your feedback -- particularly in the form of written-out comments -- is valuable insight as we determine ways to streamline the evaluation process while providing a meaningful learning experience for participants.

General Information

Contest(Required)

DeForest - Jan. 28, 2023

Role(Required)

Judge

Coach

Student

Other

Category(ies)(Required)

Indicate category(ies) you participated in as a contestant or adjudicated as a judge. If you're a coach, indicate categories in which you had students participating. Some additional categories offered at invitational meets are included for reference, as the same structure evaluation sheets will be used for those.

Speech Criteria

Speech Criteria(Required)

How well do guided questions for evaluation under each heading reflect that heading and provide a "complete picture" of what skills should be evaluated? (If not, please elaborate in comments below).

Speech Criteria Comments

Please elaborate on how speech criteria could be improved, either in general, or with specific categories.

Performance of Literature Criteria

Performance of Literature Criteria(Required)

How well do guided questions for evaluation under each heading reflect that heading and provide a "complete picture" of what skills should be evaluated? (If not, please elaborate in comments below).

Performance of Literature Criteria Comments

Please elaborate on how performance of literature criteria could be improved, either in general, or with specific categories.

Broadcast Criteria

Broadcast Criteria(Required)

How well do guided questions for evaluation under each heading reflect that heading and provide a "complete picture" of what skills should be evaluated? (If not, please elaborate in comments below).

Broadcast Criteria Comments

Please elaborate on how broadcast criteria could be improved, either in general, or with specific categories.

Numerical Rubric

Please note this new, six-point rubric and answer the questions that follow.

Degree in which the entry meets demands and standards expressed by each evaluation criterion:
1	Minimal	Missing essential elements
2	Emerging	Significant need for growth
3	Developing	Room for improvement in some areas
4	Proficient	Meets expectations
5	Mastery	Exceeds expectations
6	Exemplary	Sophisticated, innovative, and/or creative

Numerical Rubric(Required)

	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly agree
Descriptions for each score value make sense
Six points allow for more nuance in scores
I am noticing a larger range of scores
Scores tend to be along higher values (4+)

Rubric Values

Please comment on the numerical rubric.

General Comments

Other general feedback you'd like to share about the evaluation sheet, its structure, etc.

Comments

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.