The “resolution” column will show the outcome of the committee’s deliberations, once added by the chair/Speech Advisor.
Number of records to review: 13
Serial | 11 |
---|---|
Date Updated | 05/05/2023 |
Category | Play Acting |
Contestant Name(s) | Eirinn Carr, Coen Faber, Maddie Oimoen |
Nature of Concern |
|
Describe concern | The judge did not give an area of concern or feedback, yet took away a point. |
What adjudicator specifically wrote or did | Good movement around your area. Facial expressions were great. |
Evaluation Sheet(s) | Carr-Faber-Oimoen.pdf |
Round/Time | Virtual State |
Committee Review | |
Initial Advisor Comments | I think a point should be restored because there was absolutely no feedback for point deduction. |
Resolution: | Upheld |
Disposition | The referee committee reviewed the entire evaluation and saw that whenever point was deducted, there was some feedback for that deduction; however, in physical delivery, there was no reason for point deduction. Therefore, committee believes that point should be restored. Adjudicator may have typed in wrong number for physical delivery. |
Result Number | 0 |