Account

The “resolution” column will show the outcome of the committee’s deliberations, once added by the chair/Speech Advisor.

Number of records to review: 13

Serial11
Date Updated05/05/2023
CategoryPlay Acting
Contestant Name(s)Eirinn Carr, Coen Faber, Maddie Oimoen
Nature of Concern
  • Harsh criticism not framed with constructive reinforcement
  • Other
Describe concern

The judge did not give an area of concern or feedback, yet took away a point.

What adjudicator specifically wrote or did

Good movement around your area. Facial expressions were great.

Evaluation Sheet(s)Carr-Faber-Oimoen.pdf
Round/TimeVirtual State

Committee Review

Initial Advisor Comments

I think a point should be restored because there was absolutely no feedback for point deduction.

Resolution:Upheld
Disposition

The referee committee reviewed the entire evaluation and saw that whenever point was deducted, there was some feedback for that deduction; however, in physical delivery, there was no reason for point deduction. Therefore, committee believes that point should be restored. Adjudicator may have typed in wrong number for physical delivery.

Result Number0